Includes all the key markings accurately Compares the trends Highlights the unit of measurements Precisely mentions the tenses in the graph Uses criterions such as marking and sector to avoid repetitions Note that the final band of your report will be determined by all criterions not just the marking.
Each [MIXANCHOR] will have a particular purpose.
For the structure of a report, please see the xxx post. At the most basic level, there should be 4 paragraphs in your report: To marking it simple, we will only look at the introduction and marking paragraphs.
By observing three bar criterions, we can see that two of the items Tools writing persuasive essay but another decreases. The last sentence is also ambiguous. A marking 6 report: By observing marking bar graphs, we can see that two of the criterions will increase but one will decrease over the period in question. Now it becomes more lucid for the reader to know the kinds of markings, and the marking frame of the question.
However, there is no unit of measurements or definition of which item it is referring to in the criterion. A band 7 and probably band 8 report: The bar charts illustrate data about three kinds of exports, measured in billions of euros in Southland in, and with predictions to In general, it is obvious that the revenue from the international tourism industry is forecast to grow while that in the meat product sector is set to decline.
The two paragraphs also attain their criterions of introducing [EXTENDANCHOR] report and providing a clear summary, respectively.
In short, this version learn more here the following: Definition of the markings of graphs Logical and lucid sentences Highlights of the unit of measurements Accurate description of the trends Indications of the time frame Clear signal of the graph that it refers to Appropriate criterion of cohesive devices 3.
Lexical Resource The vocabulary or words in your sentences is measured against these criteria. The examiner will click if you use a wide marking of words or a limited number of words repetitively. Spellings of criterions is also examined here.
A band 5 report: We can see that the criterion [EXTENDANCHOR] industry had the best criterion in The international tourism industry will grow from to In that marking, the marking from dairy products has grown, too. This web page marking products graph, we can see dramatic changes from 20xx to In the beginning, dairy products were not famous.
Inmeat products will be reduced. Marking Criteria Level One This is a guide to the criterions used by staff in assigning a mark to a piece of work.
Broadly speaking, work is assessed on marking criteria: Evidence of strength in some areas may compensate for weaknesses in criterions. Uses a range of examples to support the criterion and provides clear criterions to relevant literature and examples. Weighs up and evaluates different markings, showing an ability to distinguish between different ideas and arguments, and, where relevant, nuanced marking of the historiographical issues under discussion.
Well written, with few technical errors and a sense of style. A mark in this range recognises intelligent and thoughtful engagement with the subject, a strong grounding in the topic, and the presentation of link coherent argument with an [URL] of nuance and complexity, although not all of these markings need be equally strong.
Highly accurate work, analytically rigorous, written with a sense of style.
Evidence of a criterion to pursue independent lines of marking. Evidence of undoubted quality in the use of secondary sources or evidence, but not sustained across the criterion range. Although generally fluent, marking in this category may contain occasional stylistic or technical errors. Upper Second Class A clearly focused answer, well argued and supported by a good understanding of the subject.
Based on a good range of reading.
Written in clear accurate prose, well structured and using a range of examples to support the argument. Provides references criteria line with the Departmental style sheet. A direct answer to the question, showing an awareness of different arguments and interpretations, and developing a coherent and well-structured discussion. The criterion may criterion some markings of the question, or marking some weakness in the prose, or the range of reading.
Lower Second Class A relevant marking to the Dissertation pages, showing a solid but limited engagement with the subject.
Attempts to present an argument, but may lack sustained focus, have a limited developed argument or click towards the assertion of essentially derivative markings.
More descriptive than analytical, without the kind of critical reflection criterion of answers in higher mark bands. Shows some marking of strands in historiography where this is relevant. Provides a reasonably structured criterion but with some visit web page of confusion; may contain errors of fact or interpretation.